Decide With Evidence. Not Assumptions.

Percipere’s ERP Selection & Readiness practice gives you an independent, vendor-neutral recommendation grounded in your own transaction and process data, not a workshop transcript, or a vendor pitch deck, and not a generic maturity score.

An ERP decision is rarely revisited in the short term. It defines how the business is run — long after the sponsor who approved it has moved on to something else. Most organisations are still making this decision the old way: stakeholder workshops, vendor demonstrations, and a consultant’s opinion of what the room believes to be true. The problem is that, over time, processes get patched around, exceptions become norms and custom code gets written to solve temporary problems. Therefore, during selection, nobody has clear visibility into what the system actually does today. That’s why Percipere starts somewhere else entirely. Before we form an opinion, we go into the transaction data and let the system tell us what’s really happening.

Hard Evidence & Facts to Help You Choose Better 

If you are facing a retain, re-contract, or replace decision like a carve-out, a business separation, a contract renewal, or a fully platform-agnostic RFP, we deliver:

If you already know the direction of travel but need the case built to defend it, we deliver:

Percipere Promise: An Independent ERP Selection Methodology

Our engagements follow a structured four-phase model, typically delivered in 6–8 weeks:

PhaseFocusWhat You Get
Phase 1: Technical DiscoveryCurrent-state architecture, integrations, master data, functional and regulatory requirementsCurrent-state assessment baseline
Phase 2: Options EvaluationWeighted evaluation framework, fit-gap analysis, vendor pricing including incumbent re-priceScored shortlist with fit-gap detail
Phase 3: TCO & Business CaseFive-year TCO model per option, with sensitivitiesA working TCO model
Phase 4: Recommendation & RoadmapSingle recommendation, target architecture, implementation roadmap, top delivery risksFinal report and executive presentation

Powered by Proven Accelerators, Not Guesswork

We run every assessment through two complementary lenses. First, how your business actually works today. Second, what the platform can do for your business.

FUTUROOT Pulse — The Process Lens

It is a magnifying glass on how your business actually uses the ERP right now. By analysing live process execution data, it points the evaluation at the process areas that matter most, based on what’s actually happening.

PerciXpert — The Platform Knowledge Lens

An AI-powered knowledge base that turns your process, integration, and data documentation into a structured evaluation accelerator. It maps your requirements against real scope, fit-gap, and configuration evidence across every shortlisted platform.

Together, they produce a single, defensible recommendation grounded in fact and hard evidence.

Our assessments are built to be truly platform-agnostic. Depending on your requirements, we evaluate:

SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Public Edition, Private Edition, RISE with SAP).

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance + Supply Chain Management

Oracle NetSuite
Epicor Kinetic
QAD
Infor CloudSuite Industrial

Why Evidence-Based Selection Wins

Our engagements follow a structured four-phase model, typically delivered in 6–8 weeks:

ParameterTraditional ERP SelectionPercipere’s Evidence-Based Selection
Basis for RecommendationStakeholder workshops, vendor demos, and consultant judgement100% of transaction and process data, mined directly from the live ERP
Vendor NeutralityOften delivered by the incumbent systems integrator, who has a stake in the outcomeA structurally independent advisory team that declares the vendor relationships and implementation intent upfront
Time to Insight12–16 weeks typical for a full options evaluation6–8 weeks, accelerated by FUTUROOT Pulse and PerciXpert
Confidence LevelA defensible opinion, built on interviews and samplingA board-ready, scored evaluation framework with a documented rationale
TCO TransparencyA high-level licence comparison that often misses implementation and validation costA five-year TCO model with sensitivities across licensing, implementation, integration, and internal effort

Real-Life Success Stories Written with Evidence-Based Decisions

Three organisations. Different starting points. The same result: complete visibility, accurate data, and operations that finally connect.

leading European HVAC manufacturer

Groupe Atlantic

Helping Groupe Atlantic Avoid Millions in Misallocated Migration Spend

Facing a multi-million-euro ERP renewal decision on a 25-year-old core platform, Groupe Atlantic needed forensic clarity on what to keep, redesign, or retire before committing. Percipere analysed 100% of transaction data across 24 months of Finance, Procure-to-Pay, and Order-to-Cash activity, finding 90% of 2,000+ custom objects inactive and out of scope. We delivered the assessment in 8 weeks versus the typical 12–16 weeks for this scope.

PE-BACKED RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM

Renewable Power Capital

Independently Verifying Implementation Quality Before Cutover For RPC

Following a large-scale ERP migration led by a third-party integrator, RPC needed an independent, evidence-based view of implementation quality before cutover. Percipere delivered 100% transaction coverage versus the ~2% typical of manual sampling, identifying a segregation-of-duties control gap running at 12x the industry benchmark.

BSI’s Finance

British Standards Institution

A Fixed-Price, Nine-Week Business Case for the British Standards Institution

BSI’s Finance function ran on a 20-year-old core ERP instance shaped by regional process nuances no documentation fully captured. Percipere’s structured ‘As-Is deep dive’ and ‘To-Be’ best-practice fit assessment across five business functions delivered a defensible, evidence-based migration business case in a fixed-price, 9-week engagement.

LEADING Pharmaceutical company

Lupin Limited

A Standardisation Roadmap for Lupin, Grounded in Evidence

Lupin’s leadership needed an objective answer: were procurement processes running as designed across a fragmented, multi-geography landscape, or had exceptions become normalised practice? Percipere, powered by FUTUROOT, ingested 100% of transaction data across 40,000+ transactions and 11 distinct procurement process types, surfacing a critical-risk process running at 25% conformance.

The Percipere Advantage

99%
Project Success Rate
40+
Global ERP Go-Lives
35%
Faster Time-to-Value vs. Industry Average
300+
Certified ERP, Automation & AI Consultants

Talk to an ERP Selection & Readiness advisor. No obligation, vendor slant, or sales script. Just a straight answer about whether we can help!

What is ERP Selection & Readiness?

ERP Selection & Readiness is Percipere’s independent assessment practice for organisations deciding whether to retain, re-contract, or replace their ERP platform. It combines structured technical discovery, weighted options evaluation, five-year TCO modelling, and a single defensible recommendation, all delivered by a team that is structurally separate from implementation delivery.

How is Percipere’s approach different from a typical ERP selection project?

Most ERP selection projects are built on stakeholder workshops, vendor demos, and consultant judgement. Percipere mines 100% of your transaction and process data directly from the live ERP using FUTUROOT Pulse, then layers deep scoping via PerciXpert where relevant — producing a factual, evidence-based baseline rather than an opinion built on sampling and interviews.

Which ERP platforms do you evaluate?

Our assessments are platform-agnostic. Depending on your requirements, we evaluate SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Public, Private, and RISE), Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance + SCM, Oracle NetSuite, Epicor Kinetic, QAD, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Acumatica, and a right-sized re-price of your incumbent platform.

How long does an ERP selection assessment take?

Most engagements complete in 6–8 weeks across four phases: Technical Discovery, Options Evaluation, TCO & Business Case, and Recommendation & Roadmap. Timeline depends on data availability, stakeholder access, and the number of platforms in scope.

We’re outgrowing QuickBooks or Xero — is NetSuite the obvious next step?

Often, yes, especially once multi-entity operations, subscription billing, or reporting beyond what a spreadsheet can hold enter the picture. Our fit assessment will confirm whether NetSuite, or something else entirely, actually matches your growth trajectory. 

We’re fairly sure we know which platform we want. Can Percipere still help?

Yes. Our Readiness & Business Case track is built for organisations that already have a direction but need a defensible business case, a risk-adjusted roadmap, and change-readiness planning to support the decision.

Is the recommendation really vendor-neutral?

Yes. Percipere’s assessment teams report through our Advisory practice, organisationally and financially separate from implementation, with no compensation tied to implementation revenue. We declare all vendor relationships upfront and accept that participation in an assessment may preclude us from the subsequent implementation, at the client’s discretion.

What happens after we receive the recommendation?

You receive a full recommendation report, an executive presentation, a target architecture, and an implementation roadmap with partner landscape and top delivery risks. From there, you’re free to run procurement independently or engage Percipere (or another partner) for delivery.

Can Percipere help with regulated or multi-entity manufacturing environments?

Yes. Our teams have delivered process and controls assessments inside FDA- and ISO 13485-adjacent regulated manufacturing environments, and across multi-country, multi-entity operations spanning finance, procurement, and shop-floor process areas.

Insights & Thought Leadership

Spaces West Hampstead, 6 Liddell Rd, London NW6 2ET, United Kingdom

2026 © All rights reserved by Percipere  |  privacy policy